Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 42
Filter
2.
J Infect Public Health ; 16(8): 1184-1192, 2023 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2314019

ABSTRACT

Epidemiological data regarding the incidence of secondary multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative infection in patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Brazil are still ambiguous. Thus, a case-control study was designed to determine factors associated with the acquisition of MDR Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) in patients with and without COVID-19 and describe the mortality rates and clinical features associated with unfavorable outcomes. In total, we assessed 280 patients admitted to Brazilian intensive care units from March/2020 to December/2021. During the study, 926 GNB were isolated. Out of those, 504 were MDR-GNB, representing 54.4% of the resistance rate. In addition, out of 871 patients positive for COVID-19, 73 had secondary MDR-GNB infection, which represented 8.38% of documented community-acquired GNB-MDR infections. The factors associated with patients COVID-19-MDR-GNB infections were obesity, heart failure, use of mechanical ventilation, urinary catheter, and previous use of ß-lactams. Several factors associated with mortality were identified among patients with COVID-19 infected with MDR-GNB, including the use of a urinary catheter; renal failure; and the origin of bacterial cultures such as tracheal secretion, exposure to carbapenem antibiotics, and polymyxin. Mortality was significantly higher in patients with COVID-19-MDR-GNB (68.6%) compared to control groups, where COVID-19 was 35.7%, MDR-GNB was 50%, and GNB was 21.4%. Our findings demonstrate that MDR-GNB infection associated with COVID-19 has an expressive impact on increasing the case fatality rate, reinforcing the importance of minimizing the use of invasive devices and prior exposure to antimicrobials to control the bacterial spread in healthcare environments to improve the prognosis among critical patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections , Humans , Gram-Negative Bacteria , Case-Control Studies , Risk Factors , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
3.
PeerJ ; 11: e15007, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2248861

ABSTRACT

Bloodstream infections due to bacteria are a highly consequential nosocomial occurrences and the organisms responsible for them are usually multidrug-resistant. The aims of this study were to describe the incidence of bacteremia caused by Gram-negative ESKAPE bacilli during the COVID-19 pandemic and characterize the clinical and microbiological findings including antimicrobial resistance. A total of 115 Gram-negative ESKAPE isolates were collected from patients with nosocomial bacteremia (18% of the total bacteremias) in a tertiary care center in Mexico City from February 2020 to January 2021. These isolates were more frequently derived from the Respiratory Diseases Ward (27), followed by the Neurosurgery (12), Intensive Care Unit (11), Internal Medicine (11), and Infectious Diseases Unit (7). The most frequently isolated bacteria were Acinetobacter baumannii (34%), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (28%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (23%) and Enterobacter spp (16%). A. baumannii showed the highest levels of multidrug-resistance (100%), followed by K. pneumoniae (87%), Enterobacter spp (34%) and P. aeruginosa (20%). The bla CTX-M-15 and bla TEM-1 genes were identified in all beta-lactam-resistant K. pneumoniae (27), while bla TEM-1 was found in 84.6% (33/39) of A. baumannii isolates. The carbapenemase gene bla OXA-398 was predominant among carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii (74%, 29/39) and bla OXA-24was detected in four isolates. One P. aeruginosa isolate was bla VIM-2 gene carrier, while two K. pneumoniae and one Enterobacter spp were bla NDM gene carriers. Among colistin-resistant isolates mcr-1 gene was not detected. Clonal diversity was observed in K. pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa and Enterobacter spp. Two outbreaks caused by A. baumannii ST208 and ST369 were detected, both belonging to the clonal complex CC92 and IC2. A. baumannii was associated with a death rate of 72% (28/32), most of them (86%, 24/28) extensively drug-resistant or pandrug-resistant isolates, mainly in patients with COVID-19 (86%, 24/28) in the Respiratory Diseases Ward. A. baumannii isolates had a higher mortality rate (72%), which was higher in patients with COVID-19. There was no statistically significant association between the multidrug-resistant profile in Gram-negative ESKAPE bacilli and COVID-19 disease. The results point to the important role of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative ESKAPE bacteria causing bacteremia in nosocomial settings before and during the COVID-19 epidemic. Additionally, we were unable to identify a local impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on antimicrobial resistance rates, at least in the short term.


Subject(s)
Anti-Infective Agents , Bacteremia , COVID-19 , Cross Infection , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections , Sepsis , Humans , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiology , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Negative Bacteria/genetics , Klebsiella pneumoniae/genetics , Enterobacter , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Sepsis/epidemiology
4.
researchsquare; 2023.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-2743275.v1

ABSTRACT

Background: Bacterial infections in COVID-19 patients, especially those caused by multidrug-resistant gram-negative strains, are associated with increased morbidity, hospital stay and mortality. However, there is limited data on the epidemiology of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing bacteria in COVID-19 patients. Here, we assessed the prevalence and the factors associated with ESBL-producing gram-negative bacteria (GNB) infections among severely ill laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 patients admitted at Kenyatta National Hospital (KNH), Kenya. Methods: We adopted a descriptive cross-sectional study design for patients admitted between October 2021 and February 2022, purposively recruiting 120 participants based on clinical presentation. Demographics and clinical characteristics data were collected using structured questionnaires and case report forms. Clinical samples were collected and analyzed by standard microbiological methods in the KNH Microbiology laboratory and the Centre for Microbiology, Kenya Medical Research Institute. Results: GNB infections prevalence was 40.8%, with the majority caused by ESBL – producers (67.3%) predominated by Klebsiella pneumoniae (45.5%). Generally, 73% of the ESBL producers harboured our target ESBL genes, mainly CTX-M-type (59%, 17/29) in K. pneumoniae (76.9%, 20/26). GNB harbouring TEM-type (83%, 10/12) and SHV-type (100%, 7/7) genes showed ESBLs phenotypes and inhibitor resistance, mainly involving clavulanate, but most of them remained susceptible to tazobactam (60%, 6/10). SHV-type genes carrying ESBL producers showed resistance to both cefotaxime CTX) and ceftazidime (CAZ) (K. pneumoniae), CAZ (E. coli) or CTX (E. cloacae complex and K. pneumoniae). About 87% (20/23) of isolates encoding CTX-M-type β-lactamases displayed the typical CTX/ceftriaxone (CRO) resistance phenotype. About 42% of isolates with CTX-M-type β-lactamases only hydrolyzed ceftazidime (CAZ). Isolates with OXA-type β-lactamases were resistant to CTX, CAZ, CRO, cefepime and aztreonam. Patients with comorbidities were about ten (10) times more likely to have an ESB-producing GNB infection (aOR =9.86, 95%CI: 1.30 – 74.63, p =0.003). Conclusion: We report a high prevalence of ESBL-GNB infections in severely ill COVID-19 patients, predominantly due to Klebsiella pneumoniae harbouring CTX-M type ESBL genes. The patient’s underlying comorbidities increased the risk of ESBL-producing GNB infection. Enhanced systematic and continuous surveillance of ESBL-producing GNB, strict adherence to infection control measures and antimicrobial stewardship policies in the current study setting are warranted.


Subject(s)
Klebsiella Infections , Bacterial Infections , Xanthomatosis, Cerebrotendinous , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections , COVID-19
5.
J Antimicrob Chemother ; 78(4): 1000-1008, 2023 04 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2245411

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Greece is among the countries characterized by high rates of antimicrobial resistance and high consumption of antibiotics, including carbapenems. OBJECTIVES: To measure the impact of a carbapenem-focused antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP) on the antibiotic consumption and patient outcomes in a Greek tertiary hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A quasi-experimental, before-after study, comparing a 12 month pre-intervention period with a 12 month intervention period in which a carbapenem-focused ASP was implemented. RESULTS: A total of 1268 patients were enrolled. The proportion of admitted patients who received carbapenems decreased from 4.1% (842 of 20 629) to 2.3% (426 of 18 245) (-1.8%; P < 0.001). A decrease of -4.9 DDD/100 patient-days (PD) (95% CI -7.3 to -2.6; P = 0.007) in carbapenem use and an increase in the use of piperacillin/tazobactam [+2.1 DDD/100 PD (95% CI 1.0-3.3; P = 0.010)] were observed. Thirty-day mortality following initiation of carbapenem treatment and all-cause in-hospital mortality remained unaltered after ASP implementation. In contrast, length of hospital stay increased (median 17.0 versus 19.0 days; P < 0.001), while the risk of infection-related readmission within 30 days of hospital discharge decreased (24.6% versus 16.8%; P = 0.007). In the post-implementation period, acceptance of the ASP intervention was associated with lower daily hazard of in-hospital death [cause-specific HR (csHR) 0.49; 95% CI 0.30-0.80], lower odds of 30 day mortality (OR 0.36; 95% CI 0.18-0.70) and higher rate of treatment success (csHR 2.45; 95% CI 1.59-3.77). CONCLUSIONS: Implementing and maintaining a carbapenem-focused ASP is feasible, effective and safe in settings with high rates of antimicrobial resistance, even during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
Antimicrobial Stewardship , COVID-19 , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections , Humans , Carbapenems/therapeutic use , Carbapenems/pharmacology , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Hospital Mortality , Pandemics , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Gram-Negative Bacteria
6.
Acta Microbiol Immunol Hung ; 70(1): 11-21, 2023 Mar 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2197409

ABSTRACT

The present study aimed to explore the genotypic and phenotypic characteristics of biofilm formation in Bulgarian nosocomial Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates (n = 221) during the period 2011-2022, by screening for the presence of biofilm-associated genes (BAG) (spgM, rmlA and rpfF), their mutational variability, and assessment of the adherent growth on a polystyrene surface. The methodology included: PCR amplification, whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and crystal violet microtiter plate assay for biofilm quantification. The overall incidence of BAG was: spgM 98.6%, rmlA 86%, and rpfF 66.5%. The most prevalent genotype was spgM+/rmlA+/rpfF+ (56.1%), followed by spgM+/rmlA+/rpfF- (28.5%), and spgM+/rmlA-/rpfF+ (9.5%), with their significant predominance in lower respiratory tract isolates compared to those with other origin (P < 0.001). All strains examined were characterized as strong biofilm producers (OD550 from 0.224 ± 0.049 to 2.065 ± 0.023) with a single exception that showed a weak biofilm-forming ability (0.177 ± 0.024). No significant differences were observed in the biofilm formation according to the isolation source, as well as among COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 isolates (1.256 ± 0.028 vs. 1.348 ± 0.128, respectively). Also, no correlation was found between the biofilm amounts and the corresponding genotypes. WGS showed that the rmlA accumulated a larger number of variants (0.0086 per base) compared to the other BAG, suggesting no critical role of its product to the biofilm formation. Additionally, two of the isolates were found to harbour class 1 integrons (7-kb and 2.6-kb sized, respectively) containing sul1 in their 3' conservative ends, which confers sulfonamide resistance. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study on S. maltophilia biofilm formation in Bulgaria, which also identifies novel sequence types (ST819, ST820 and ST826). It demonstrates the complex nature of this adaptive mechanism in the multifactorial pathogenesis of biofilm-associated infections.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cross Infection , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections , Stenotrophomonas maltophilia , Humans , Bulgaria , Stenotrophomonas maltophilia/genetics , Biofilms
7.
Semin Dial ; 36(1): 70-74, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2152848

ABSTRACT

Peritoneal dialysis (PD)-associated peritonitis secondary to Ralstonia infection is very rare. Ralstonia pickettii is an organism that can grow in contaminated saline, water, chlorhexidine, and other medical products used in laboratories and the clinical setting. Infective endocarditis, prosthetic joint, and severe chest infections are previously reported with R. pickettii infection. We report a novel series of three cases diagnosed with PD-associated peritonitis caused by R. pickettii, where the cases appeared consecutively to our unit during a span of 4 weeks. During the COVID-19 pandemic, there were increased uses of non-sterile gloves by clinical staff as a form of personal protective equipment throughout patient interaction and PD exchange, as recommended by local hospital policy for all staff attending to patient care. A multidisciplinary team root cause analysis of our cases suggested non-sterile gloves being the likely source of environmental contamination, leading to PD-associated peritonitis caused by R. pickettii in this scenario.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections , Peritoneal Dialysis , Peritonitis , Ralstonia pickettii , Humans , Pandemics , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/etiology , COVID-19/complications , Peritoneal Dialysis/adverse effects , Peritonitis/diagnosis , Peritonitis/etiology
8.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol ; 43(11): 1575-1579, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2118588

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To measure the impact of exposure to patients using carbapenem on the acquisition of carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli (CR-GNB) among patients not using carbapenems. DESIGN: An ecological study and a cohort study. SETTING: Two medical surgical intensive care units (ICUs) in inner Brazil. PARTICIPANTS: Patients admitted to 2 ICUs from 2013 through 2018 to whom carbapenem was not prescribed. METHODS: In the ecologic study, the monthly use of carbapenems (days of therapy [DOT] per 1,000 patient days) was tested for linear correlation with the 2-month moving average of incidence CR-GNB among patients to whom carbapenem was not prescribed. In the cohort study, those patients were addressed individually for risk factors (demographics, invasive interventions, use of antimicrobials) for acquisition of CR-GNB, including time at risk and the "carbapenem pressure," described as the aggregate DOT among other ICU patients during time at risk. The analysis was performed in univariate and multivariable Poisson regression models. RESULTS: The linear regression model revealed an association of total carbapenem use and incidence of CR-GNB (coefficient, 0.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.02-0.06; P = .001). In the cohort model, the adjusted rate ratio (RR) for carbapenem DOT was 1.009 (95% CI, 1.001-1.018; P = .03). Other significant risk factors were mechanical ventilation and the previous use of ceftazidime (with or without avibactam). CONCLUSIONS: Every additional DOT of total carbapenem use increased the risk of CR-GNB acquisition by patients not using carbapenems by nearly 1%. We found evidence for a population ("herd effect"-like) impact of antimicrobial use in the ICUs.


Subject(s)
Cross Infection , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections , Humans , Carbapenems/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Gram-Negative Bacteria , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Intensive Care Units , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/epidemiology
9.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 35(6): 595-604, 2022 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2107686

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Bacterial infections play a key role in hospital outcomes during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Nonetheless, the global impact on the epidemiology of Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) and antibiotic resistance has not been clearly established. RECENT FINDINGS: Multiple limitations exist in the current literature, in that substantial variability was observed with regard to methodology. Notwithstanding the heterogeneity, the evidence suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic had a substantial negative impact on global epidemiology with an increase in hospital-onset infections, associated with GNB. Similarly, an alarming increase in resistant GNB compared to prepandemic rates, was apparent. This was most evident for carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (bloodstream infections), carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ventilator-associated pneumonia), and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (all infections). Significant variations were most apparent in the large, system-wide regional or national comparative assessments, vs. single-centre studies. Categorizing concurrent bacteria as co- or secondary-infections may be paramount to optimize standard of care. SUMMARY: The data from most studies signal the probability that COVID-19 accelerated resistance. However, multiple limitations intrinsic to interpretation of current COVID-19 data, prevents accurately quantifying collateral damage on the global epidemiology and antibiotic resistance amongst GNB. It is likely to be substantial and renewed efforts to limit further increases is warranted.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Gram-Negative Bacteria , Carbapenems , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial
10.
Clinics (Sao Paulo) ; 77: 100130, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2068802

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The relationship between Multidrug Resistant-Gram Negative Bacteria (MDR-GNB) infection and colonization in critically ill COVID-19 patients has been observed, however, it is still poorly understood. This study evaluated the risk factors for acquiring MDR-GNB in patients with severe COVID-19 in Intensive Care Units (ICU). METHODS: This is a nested case-control study in a cohort of 400 adult patients (≥ 18 years old) with COVID-19, hospitalized in the ICU of 4 hospitals in the city of Curitiba, Brazil. Cases were critical COVID-19 patients with one or more MDR GNB from any surveillance and/or clinical cultures were taken during their ICU stay. Controls were patients from the same units with negative cultures for MDR-GNB. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were done. RESULTS: Sixty-seven cases and 143 controls were included. Independent risk factors for MDR bacteria were: male gender (OR = 2.6; 95% CI 1.28‒5.33; p = 0.008); the hospital of admission (OR = 3.24; 95% CI 1.39‒7.57; p = 0.006); mechanical ventilation (OR = 25.7; 95% CI 7.26‒91; p < 0.0001); and desaturation on admission (OR = 2.6; 95% CI 1.27‒5.74; p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Male gender, desaturation, mechanical ventilation, and the hospital of admission were the independent factors associated with MDR-GNB in patients in the ICU with COVID-19. The only modifiable factor was the hospital of admission, where a newly opened hospital posed a higher risk. Therefore, coordinated actions toward a better quality of care for critically ill COVID-19 patients are essential.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cross Infection , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections , Adult , Humans , Male , Adolescent , Gram-Negative Bacteria , Critical Illness , Case-Control Studies , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Risk Factors , Intensive Care Units , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology
11.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 35(6): 605-613, 2022 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2051764

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: SARS-CoV-2 deeply modified the risk of bacterial infection, bacterial resistance, and antibiotic strategies. This review summarized what we have learned. RECENT FINDINGS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, we observed an increase in healthcare-acquired infection and multidrug-resistant organism-related infection, triggered by several factors: structural factors, such as increased workload and ongoing outbreaks, underlying illnesses, invasive procedures, and treatment-induced immunosuppression. The two most frequently healthcare-acquired infections described in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 were bloodstream infection, related or not to catheters, health-acquired pneumonia (in ventilated or nonventilated patients). The most frequent species involved in bacteremia were Gram-positive cocci and Gram-negative bacilli in health-acquired pneumonia. The rate of Gram-negative bacilli is particularly high in late-onset ventilator-associated pneumonia, and the specific risk of Pseudomonas aeruginosa- related pneumonia increased when the duration of ventilation was longer than 7 days. A specificity that remains unexplained so far is the increase in enterococci bacteremia. SUMMARY: The choice of empiric antibiotimicrobials depends on several factors such as the site of the infection, time of onset and previous length of stay, previous antibiotic therapy, and known multidrug-resistant organism colonization. Pharmacokinetics of antimicrobials could be markedly altered during SARS-CoV-2 acute respiratory failure, which should encourage to perform therapeutic drug monitoring.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Cross Infection , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections , Humans , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Cross Infection/drug therapy , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Gram-Negative Bacteria , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Bacteremia/microbiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Risk Assessment
12.
BMC Infect Dis ; 22(1): 696, 2022 Aug 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2002122

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Capnocytophaga canimorsus, a Gram-negative rod, belongs to the Flavobacteriaceae family and colonizes the oropharynx of dogs and cats. Infections with C. canimorsus are rare and can induce a systemic infection with a severe course of the disease. So far, only five case reports of C. canimorsus infections associated with Waterhouse-Friderichsen Syndrome (WFS) have been reported with only two of the patients having a history of splenectomy. CASE PRESENTATION: Here, we report a fatal case of WFS due to C. canimorsus bacteremia and mycetal superinfection in a 61-year-old female asplenic patient. Despite extensive therapy including mechanical ventilation, antibiotic coverage with meropenem, systemic corticosteroids medication, vasopressor therapy, continuous renal replacement therapy, therapeutic plasma exchange, multiple transfusions of blood products and implantation of a veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation the patient died 10 days after a dog bite. The autopsy showed bilateral hemorrhagic necrosis of the adrenal cortex and septic embolism to heart, kidneys, and liver. Diagnosis of C. canimorsus was prolonged due to the fastidious growth of the bacteria. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of a severe sepsis after dog bite should always urge the attending physician to consider C. canimorsus as the disease-causing pathogen. A therapeutic regimen covering C. canimorsus such as aminopenicillins or carbapenems should be chosen. However, despite maximum therapy, the prognosis of C. canimorsus-induced septic shock remains very poor. Asplenic or otherwise immunocompromised patients are at higher risk for a severe course of disease and should avoid exposure to dogs and cats and consider antibiotic prophylaxis after animal bite.


Subject(s)
Bites and Stings , Cat Diseases , Dog Diseases , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections , Sepsis , Waterhouse-Friderichsen Syndrome , Animals , Bites and Stings/complications , Capnocytophaga , Cats , Dog Diseases/diagnosis , Dog Diseases/therapy , Dogs , Female , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Sepsis/diagnosis , Waterhouse-Friderichsen Syndrome/complications
13.
researchsquare; 2022.
Preprint in English | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-1781463.v1

ABSTRACT

Background: Excessive use of antibiotics has been reported during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. We evaluated trends in antibiotic use and culture positive Gram-negative (GN)/Gram-positive (GP) pathogens in US hospitalized patients before and during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Methods: : This multicenter, retrospective study included patients from 271 US facilities with >1-day inpatient admission with discharge or death between July 1, 2019, and October 30, 2021, in the BD Insights Research Database. We evaluated microbiological testing data, antibacterial use, defined as antibacterial use ≥24 hours in admitted patients, and duration of antibacterial therapy. Results: : Of 5,518,744 patients included in the analysis, 3,729,295 (67.6%) patients were hospitalized during the pandemic with 2,087,774 (56.0%) tested for SARS-CoV-2 and 189,115 (9.1%) testing positive for SARS-CoV-2. During the pre-pandemic period, 36.2% were prescribed antibacterial therapy and 9.3% tested positive for select GN/GP pathogens. During the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, antibacterial therapy (57.8%) and positive GN/GP culture (11.9%) were highest in SARS-CoV-2-positive patients followed by SARS-CoV-2-negative patients (antibacterial therapy, 40.1%; GN/GP, pathogens 11.0%), and SARS-CoV-2 not tested (antibacterial therapy 30.4%; GN/GP pathogens 7.2%). Multivariate results showed significant decreases in antibacterial therapy and positive GN/GP cultures for both SARS-CoV-2-positive and negative patients during the pandemic, but no significant overall changes from the pre-pandemic period to the pandemic period. Conclusions: : There was a decline in both antibacterial use and positive GN/GP pathogens in patients testing positive for SARS-CoV-2. However, overall antibiotic use was similar prior to and during the pandemic. These data may inform future efforts to optimize antimicrobial stewardship and prescribing.


Subject(s)
Behcet Syndrome , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections
14.
Am J Case Rep ; 23: e936889, 2022 Jul 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1954989

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND We aimed to identify the risk factors for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection in patients with COVID-19. CASE REPORT Case 1. A 52-year-old COVID-19-positive woman with systemic lupus erythematosus was administered remdesivir (RDV) and methylprednisolone (mPSL) 1000 mg/day for 3 days, and subsequently administered baricitinib and ceftriaxone. Following respiratory deterioration, she was transferred to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) and the antibiotics were switched to meropenem (MEPM). Blood and sputum cultures were positive for S. maltophilia. Administration of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) showed clinical improvement. Case 2. An 80-year-old COVID-19-positive man was treated with RDV, dexamethasone, and baricitinib. Owing to severe hypoxia, he was transferred to the ICU and MEPM was administered. Sputum culture was positive for S. maltophilia. TMP-SMX administration temporarily improved his symptoms; however, he died from COVID-19-associated invasive aspergillosis. Case 3. A 48-year-old COVID-19-positive man who was mechanically intubated was transferred to our hospital and treated with RDV, mPSL, and piperacillin/tazobactam. Sputum culture revealed S. maltophilia; treatment with TMP-SMX improved his respiratory status. Case 4. An 80-year-old COVID-19-positive man was treated with RDV and dexamethasone. Owing to severe hypoxemia, he was transferred to the ICU and the antibiotics were switched to MEPM. Sputum culture revealed S. maltophilia. Administration of TMX-SMX improved his respiratory status. CONCLUSIONS Isolation of S. maltophilia in respiratory specimens of patients with COVID-19 should prompt clinicians to administer treatment for S. maltophilia-associated pneumonia in ICU-admitted patients who have been intubated, have been administered broad-spectrum antibiotics, or have immunocompromised status.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections , Stenotrophomonas maltophilia , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Dexamethasone/therapeutic use , Female , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Trimethoprim, Sulfamethoxazole Drug Combination/therapeutic use
15.
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo ; 64: e33, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1951715

ABSTRACT

Capnocytophaga canimorsus is a gram-negative rod that is part of the commensal microbiota of dogs' and cats' mouths. In this case, we report an 85-year-old man with COVID-19 who had his right arm bitten by a dog. His symptoms were impaired consciousness, agitation and aggressive behavior. Physical examination revealed neck stiffness and Brudzinski's sign. The cerebrospinal fluid culture was compatible with Capnocytophaga canimorsus. He required intensive care and received a 14-day prescription of meropenem. After 40 days of hospitalization, the patient was fully recovered and was discharged. This case highlights the importance of physician and microbiologist be awareness of this disease, mainly in patients with neurological symptoms after a dog or cat bite.


Subject(s)
Bites and Stings , COVID-19 , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections , Meningitis , Animals , Bites and Stings/complications , COVID-19/complications , Capnocytophaga , Dogs , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/complications , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Humans , Male
16.
Microb Drug Resist ; 28(5): 601-610, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1864944

ABSTRACT

This retrospective study aims to describe the etiology and resistance patterns of pathogens causing bacteremia in children with solid tumors in a tertiary pediatric hematology-oncology center in Jerusalem, Israel (2011-2019). Factors associated with multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteremia and mortality were analyzed. A total of 228 pathogens were isolated in 126 patients; 61.0% were gram-negative rods (GNR) and 38.2% were gram-positive cocci (GPC). The most common pathogens were Klebsiella pneumoniae (19.3%), Escherichia coli (17.5%), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (16.2%). The proportion of MDR-GNR was 18.2%, while the proportion of MDR-GPC was 55.2%. In logistic regression analysis, breakthrough bacteremia on a penicillin-group antibiotic (odds ratio [OR] 5.69, [95% confidence interval 1.42-22.76], p-value = 0.014) was associated and underlying diagnosis of neuroblastoma was inversely associated (OR 0.17, [0.04-0.81], p-value = 0.026) with MDR-GNR bacteremia; while the previous hospitalizations' duration (OR 1.032/day, [1.01-1.06], p-value = 0.007) and oncologic treatment intensity (OR 2.19, [1.08-4.45, p-value = 0.03) were associated with MDR-GPC bacteremia. Shock, prolonged profound neutropenia, and pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission were associated with 7-day mortality; and relapsed disease, oncologic treatment intensity, prolonged profound neutropenia, and PICU admission-with 30-day mortality in the univariate analyses. Empirical antibiotic choice should be based on factors associated with MDR infections in this specific population.


Subject(s)
Bacteremia , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections , Neoplasms , Neutropenia , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Bacteremia/drug therapy , Bacteremia/epidemiology , Child , Drug Resistance, Multiple , Escherichia coli , Gram-Negative Bacteria , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Humans , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/pathology , Neutropenia/complications , Neutropenia/drug therapy , Retrospective Studies
17.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 19(9)2022 04 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1809915

ABSTRACT

Bacterial co-infections may aggravate COVID-19 disease, and therefore being cognizant of other pathogens is imperative. We studied the types, frequency, antibiogram, case fatality rates (CFR), and clinical profiles of co-infecting-pathogens in 301 COVID-19 patients. Co-infection was 36% (n = 109), while CFR was 31.2% compared to 9.9% in non-co-infected patients (z-value = 3.1). Four bacterial species dominated, namely, multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (37%, n = 48), extremely drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (26%, n = 34), multidrug-resistant Eschericia. coli (18.6%, n = 24), and extremely drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (8.5%, n = 11), in addition to other bacterial species (9.3%, n = 12). Increased co-infection of K. pneumoniae and A. baumannii was associated with increased death rates of 29% (n = 14) and 32% (n = 11), respectively. Klebsiella pneumoniae was equally frequent in respiratory and urinary tract infections (UTI), while E. coli mostly caused UTI (67%), and A. baumannii and P. aeruginosa dominated respiratory infections (38% and 45%, respectively). Co-infections correlated with advance in age: seniors ≥ 50 years (71%), young adults 21-49 years (25.6%), and children 0-20 years (3%). These findings have significant clinical implications in the successful COVID-19 therapies, particularly in geriatric management. Future studies would reveal insights into the potential selective mechanism(s) of Gram-negative bacterial co-infection in COVID-19 patients.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections , COVID-19 , Coinfection , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections , Urinary Tract Infections , Aged , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bacteria , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Child , Coinfection/drug therapy , Coinfection/epidemiology , Escherichia coli , Female , Gram-Negative Bacteria , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Male , Microbial Sensitivity Tests , Middle Aged , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , Urinary Tract Infections/drug therapy
18.
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo ; 64: e6, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1686200

ABSTRACT

Some studies have shown that secondary infections during the COVID-19 pandemic may have contributed to the high mortality. Our objective was to identify the frequency, types and etiology of bacterial infections in patients with COVID-19 admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) and to evaluate the results of ICU stay, duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) and in-hospital mortality. It was a single-center study with a retrospective cohort of patients admitted consecutively to the ICU for more than 48 h between March and May 2020. Comparisons of groups with and without ICU- acquired infection were performed. A total of 191 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were included and 57 patients had 97 secondary infectious events. The most frequent agents were Acinetobacter baumannii (28.9%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (22.7%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (14.4%); multi-drug resistance was present in 96% of A. baumannii and in 57% of K. pneumoniae. The most prevalent infection was ventilator-associated pneumonia in 57.9% of patients with bacterial infections, or 17.3% of all COVID-19 patients admitted to the ICU, followed by tracheobronchitis (26.3%). Patients with secondary infections had a longer ICU stay (40.0 vs. 17 days; p < 0.001), as well as a longer duration of MV (24.0 vs 9.0 days; p= 0.003). There were 68 (35.6%) deaths overall, of which 27 (39.7%) patients had bacterial infections. Among the 123 survivors, 30 (24.4%) had a secondary infections (OR 2.041; 95% CI 1.080 - 3.859). A high incidence of secondary infections, mainly caused by gram-negative bacteria has been observed. Secondary infections were associated with longer ICU stay, MV use and higher mortality.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Coinfection , Cross Infection , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Gram-Negative Bacteria , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Pandemics , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2
20.
Indian J Med Microbiol ; 40(1): 46-50, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1521052

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is an emerging multi-drug resistant pathogen increasingly isolated in India. This study aimed to identify patients from whom Stenotrophomonas maltophilia had been isolated and assess predictors of mortality in this population. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of hospitalized patients with a positive culture for S. maltophilia over a 3-year period. Clinical details and laboratory results were assessed from hospital records. Bivariate and multivariate analysis was used to identify risk factors for mortality. RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen patients (mean age 48.6 years) were included in the study. Of these, 111 patients were hospitalized for at least 48 â€‹hours prior to culture and 98 were admitted in the intensive care unit. Bivariate analysis revealed multiple associations with mortality, including a background of renal, cardiac, autoimmune disease, recent carbapenam use and COVID-19 infection and increasing ventilatory requirement, lower PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio, vasopressor use, thrombocytopenia, and hypoalbuminemia at the time of positive isolate. Multivariate analysis showed that autoimmune disease [OR 27.38; 95% CI (1.39-540)], a P/F ratio of less than 300 [OR 7.58; 95% CI (1.52-37.9)], vasopressor requirement [OR 39.50; 95% CI (5.49-284)] and thrombocytopenia [OR 11.5; 95% CI (2.04-65.0)] were statistically significantly associated with increased mortality, while recent surgery and receipt of antibiotics [OR 0.16; 95% CI (0.03-0.8)] targeted against S. maltophilia were associated with decreased mortality. CONCLUSION: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia is primarily isolated in patients in the intensive care unit. In our study the need for vasopressors, autoimmune disease, lower P/F ratios and thrombocytopenia were associated with higher mortality. The association of targeted antibiotics with reduced mortality suggests that the pathogenic role of S. maltophilia should not be underestimated. This finding needs to be confirmed with larger, prospective studies.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections , Stenotrophomonas maltophilia , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections/drug therapy , Humans , India/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Stenotrophomonas , Tertiary Care Centers
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL